29th INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON OLYMPIC STUDIES FOR POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS

    7–26 September 2022

    EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

    Seeking information is part of a research project that is being conducted by the International Olympic Academy in order to evaluate the Seminar. To be more exact, we want to find out about the organisation, the lectures and the discussion groups of this Seminar.

    ONLY 7 MINUTES WILL BE NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.

    The Report of the results will be published.

    We would like to thank you in advance for your cooperation!

    To what degree do you agree with the statements below?

    1. ORGANISATION

    The organisation of the Seminar was of a high standard
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The accommodation was of a high standard
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The staff of the International Olympic Academy was helpful
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    2. LECTURES

    The lecturers were very well prepared
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The accompanying audiovisual material was adequate
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    Sufficient time was allowed for the lectures
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The texts of the lectures were easy to understand and encouraged creative thinking
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The lectures contained new points and ideas
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    3. DISCUSSION

    The discussion between lecturers and participants was essential
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The discussion helped to explore the issues raised more thoroughly
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    4. WORKING GROUPS

    The coordinator was very well prepared
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The way the discussion was organised encouraged the contribution of all the participants
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The working group in which I took part, had clear aims and conclusions
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The working group in which I took part, helped me to enrich my knowledge through the issues that were raised
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    5. GENERAL IMPRESSION OF THE SEMINAR

    The quality and quantity of information offered by the Seminar lived up to my expectations
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    The knowledge that I gained from the Seminar, will really help me to spread the Olympic ideals in my country
    Totally AgreePartially AgreeNeither Agree nor DisagreePartially DisagreeTotally Disagree

    6. What is your opinion about the lecturers of the Seminar on the following scale (1=very good, 5=poor)

    Prof. Dr Adrianna BANIO (POL)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Patrick CLASTRES (FRA)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Christophe DELECLUSE (BEL)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Konstantinos GEORGIADIS (GRE)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Holger PREUSS (GER)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Angela SCHNEIDER (CAN)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Reinhard SENFF (GER)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Jan TOLLENEER (BEL)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    Prof. Dr Ioannis XYDOPOULOS (GRE)

    Content 12345
    Presentation – Method 12345
    Discussion with the participants 12345


    8. PERSONAL INFORMATION

    Gender:
    MaleFemale

    Age:
    20-2930-3940-4950-64

    Country (optionally):

    Level of Education:
    Primary and secondary educationBarchelor’s DegreeMaster’s DegreePhDOther

    Occupation:

    How would you rate your overall satisfaction in your participation in the Seminar:
    ExcellentGoodAcceptableBelow averagePoor

    GENERAL COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS